Hakim Bukan Corong Undang-Undang, Hakim Bukan Corong Masyarakat, Dan Hakim Adalah Corong Keadilan

Authors

  • Ruby Falahadi UPN Veteran Jakarta
  • Victor Eric Fransiscus Gultom UPN Veteran Jakarta
  • Lucia Roida UPN Veteran Jakarta
  • Hendra Setiawan UPN Veteran Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v1i1.15

Keywords:

HAKIM ADALAH CORONG KEADILAN

Abstract

Many judge has been handling the cases in court whose have not  understanded the phenomenon. The judges have not consideration for methapisycal facts behind the rationality. The problems have been being the habit of our judicial process which presented the fact as evidence. So, basically from what they'd seen, heard and taken. The judges have to make decisions in case from signification behind the facts. It caused the facts in court have just raw materials. So in this case, what is the truely wish? That's the judge must be understand it. We have to admit it that so many problems finished in this country have not on the basis as the significance, resulting in it only on the area's surface. This research has used library research which emphasizes the source of information from legal books, journals, papers, newspapers, and literatures related to and relevant to the object of study. The data obtained from clarification and criticism carefully according with the reference. Using deductive analysis method, the data analysis in that weighs on rules or norms that are general and then drawn special conclusions.

The practice is common in almost of indonesia judiciary. So that the expected justice is only formal and the resulting justice is based only on the facts and the formulation of the article. Therefore the judge is not a mouthpiece of the legislation or just a law enforcement as playing a puzzle unloading pairs of children's toys. The cases that befell the little people are proof that our judges are more of a punisher than a complainant. Our judges in carrying out the rule of law are very mechanistic-procedural, far from the sensitivity of justice. From these cases to be concrete evidence that Indonesian judges in examining cases or the case is always based on formal evidence, whereas formal evidence is very likely fabricated. The evidence is a case of pepper theft in Sinjai, evidence that was originally half an ounce to half a kilogram. The cases that be fell the little people  are  proof  that  our  judges  are  more  of  a  punisher than a complainant.

 

References

Buku :

Achmad Ali, 2017, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence), Jakarta : Kencana.

Abdul Fickar Hadjar, 2014. Hakim Juga Manusia, Jakarta : PT Candimas Metropole.

Andi Hamza, 2010. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta : PT Rineka Cipta.

Anas Yusuf, 2016. Implementasi Restoratif Jutice Dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Polri Demi Mewujudkan Keadilan Substntif, Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.

Edi Setiadi, Kristian, Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu dan Sistem Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Fajar Interpratama Mandiri. 2017.

Eriyantouw Wahid, 2009, Keadilan Restoraatif dan Peradilan Konvensional Dalam Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti.

Hans Kelsen, Teori Hukum Murni Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Hukum Normatif, Bandung : Nusa Media, 2014.

Jimly Asshiddiqie, M. Ali Safa’at, Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum, Jakarta: Konstitusi Press (Konpress).

Munir Fuady, 2013, Sejarah Hukum, Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2014. Ilmu Hukum, Bandung : PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

Sukarno Aburaera, Muhadar, Maskun, Filsafat Hukum Teori Hukum dan Praktik, Jakarat: Prenadamedia Group, 2015.

Satjipto Rahardjo, 2014, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2014.

Yati Nurhayati, 2020, Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Nusa Media.

Jurnal

Yati Nurhayati, (2013), “Perdebatan Metode Normatif dengan Metode Empirik Dalam Penelitian Ilmu Hukum Ditinjau Dari Karakter, Fungsi dan Tujuan Ilmu Hukum”, Jurnal Al Adl, Volume 5 Nomor 10.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Pengadilan.

Internet

Detik News, “Mencuri 3 Buah Kakou Nenek Minah Dihukum 1 Bulan 15 Hari”,https://news.detik.com/berita/d-1244955/mencuri-3-buah-kakao-nenek-minah-dihukum-1-bulan-15-hari, tanggaal 15 November 2020 pukul 02. 15.

Helmi Fidaus,”Nenek Asiani Dinyatakan Bersalah”

https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/ 20150423151941-12-48782/nenek-asiani-dinyatakan-bersalah, tanggal 15 November 2020 pukul 01. 00

www.hukumonline.com,”Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Pengdilan Masi Lemah”, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt51501b6f0b4f5/kepercayaan-publik-terhadap-pengadilan-masih-lemah, tanggal 16 November 2020 pukul 19. 20.

Pengadilan Tinggi Gorontalo, “Sejarah Pengadilan Negeri”, https://pt-gorontalo.go.id/ page/sejarah-lembaga., pada tanggal 14 November 2020 pukul 16. 00.

Pengadilan Negeri Kebumen,”Sejarah Pengadilan Negeri”, http://www.pn-kebumen.go.id/index.php/tentang-pengadilan/profile-pengadilan/2015-05-30-06-25-03?showall=1&limitstart=. , pada tangal 14 November 2020 pukul 15. 15.

http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/citahukum/article/view/1462

http://202.4.186.66/kanun/article/view/14792

https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lppmekososbudkum/article/view/7208

http://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/article/view/343

Downloads

Published

2021-03-05

How to Cite

Falahadi, R. ., Gultom, V. E. F., Roida , L. ., & Setiawan, H. . (2021). Hakim Bukan Corong Undang-Undang, Hakim Bukan Corong Masyarakat, Dan Hakim Adalah Corong Keadilan. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 1(1), 88-104. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v1i1.15