Itikad Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Merek: Studi Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia

Authors

  • Medisita Nurfauziah Istiqmalia Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
  • Iwan Erar Joesoef

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i3.10

Keywords:

Merek Terkenal, Pendaftaran Merek, First To File, famous trademark, registration trademark

Abstract

One of the disputed cases of the ALSTYLE Mark filed by Gildan Active-wear which proved its brand fame filed a legal action against the same trademark owner as the Darmanto trademark owner. The Commercial Court and Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia have given different considerations to the protection of marks in the settlement of Mark disputes. The formulation of this problem is how well-known trademarks are protected in Indonesia in the event that similar marks have been registered and how the judges of the Commercial Court consider legal protection for well-known marks. This research method uses normative juridical legal research methods with analysis techniques using qualitative data. The result of this research is the legal protection of the right holder of a well-known trademark in the event that there is a trademark that has been registered at the Directorate of IPR, then based on the legalprovisions of the Directorate of IPR trademarks can cancel a brand that has the same in essence and in its entirety to a well-known mark for similar goods. The criteria for a well-known brand can be seen from the general knowledge of the public and the reputation of the brand which is obtained due to intense promotion and investment. Second, the legal consideration of the Panel of Judges states that even though trademark registration follows a first to file system it does not mean neglecting the good faithof a well-known brand and overriding the status of a well-known trademark belonging to Gildan Activewear SRL.

References

Buku :

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin. 2010. Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo.

Djumhana, Muhamad dan Djubaedillah. 2016. Hak Milik Intelektual, Sejarah, Teori, dan Praktiknya di Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Purba, Achmad Zen Umar. 2005. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Pasca TRIPS. Bandung: Alumni.

Saidin, Ok. 2016. Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (Intellectual Property Rights). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo. Cetakan ke-9.

Sjahputra, Iman. Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual (Suatu Pengantar). Jakarta: Harvindo.

Titon Slamet Kurnia, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia Pasca Perjanjian TRIP’s, Bandung: Alumni, 2011.

Tomi Surya Utomo, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI) Di Era Globalisasi Sebuah Kajian Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2010.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 Tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establshing The World Trade Organization (Persetujuan Pembentukan Organisasi Perdagangan Dunia).

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 15 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pengesahan Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and Convention Establishing the World Intelectuall Property Organization.

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 17 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pengesahan Trademark Law Treaty.

Peraturan Menteri Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia No. 67 Tahun 2016 Tentang Pendaftaran Merek.

Jurnal dan Publikasi Lainnya:

Arifin, Zainal dan Muhammad Iqbal. 2020. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Yang Terdaftar. Jurnal Ius Constituendum. Vol. 5., No. 1. April 2020.

Bafadhal, Thoyyibah. 2018. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal di Indonesia: Kasus IKEA. Undang: Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 1., No.1. April 2018.

Chandra, Dendy Widya, et.al. 2020. Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Asing Yang Belum Terdaftar di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Sengketa Merek KEEN). Jurnal Notarius. Vol. 13., No. 1. Maret 2020.

Hastuti, Indira. 2019. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemilik Merek Terkenal Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Jurnal Hukum dan Dinamika Masyarakat. Vol. 16., No. 2. April 2019.

Hidayati, Nurul dan Naomi Yuli Ester S. 2017. Urgensi Perlindungan Merek Melalui Protokol Madrid (Trademark Protection Urgency Through the Madrid Protocol). Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. Vol. 14., No. 2. Juni 2017.

Murjiyanto, R. 2017). Konsep Kepemilikan Hak Atas Merek Di Indonesia (Studi Pergeseran Sistem Deklaratif Ke Dalam Sistem Konstitutif”). Jurnal Quia Iustum. Vol. 24., Issue 1. Januari 2017.

Sujatmiko, Agung. 2011. Tinjauan Filosofis Perlindungan Hak Milik Atas Merek. Jurnal Media Hukum. Vol. 18., No. 2. Desember 2011.

Sulastri, et.al. 2018. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek (Tinjauan Terhadap Merek Dagang Tupperware Versus Tulipware). Jurnal Yuridis. Vol. 5., No. 1. Juni 2018.

Sulasytyawati, Dwi. 2014. Hukum Pajak Dan Implementasinya Bagi Kesejahteraan Rakyat. Salam: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya. Vol. 1., No. 1. Juli 2014.

Putusan Pengadilan :

Putusan Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 3/Pdt.Sus-Merek/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.

Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 999 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2019

Downloads

Published

2021-10-19

How to Cite

Nurfauziah Istiqmalia, M., & Erar Joesoef, I. . (2021). Itikad Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Merek: Studi Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia. Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia, 2(3), 406-426. https://doi.org/10.51749/jphi.v2i3.10